This raises an obvious question for The New York Times: should Bill Kristol’s contract as an opinion columnist be renewed when it runs up at year’s end? There is no problem with the conservative viewpoint advanced in his pieces—he was after all hired as a replacement for a conservative voice, William Safire. Still, the Times must be concerned about Kristol’s intervention in the campaign he was writing about. Simply put, the pundit meddled in the campaign he was commenting on.Interesting.
"[T]he court overruled its 91-year-old decision in Humphrey’s Executor v.
United States... [M]ore broadly, Monday’s decision was a major victory for
proponents of the 'unitary executive' theory..."
-
"... the idea that the president should have complete control over the
executive branch. Under this theory, the president should be able to fire
any member...
7 hours ago
0 comments:
Post a Comment