Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Quote of the day

"Ultimately, I believe that marriage will be strengthened if less people marry. This is a counterintuitive claim. But given the challenge inherent in matrimony, it stands to reason that there won't be as many couples truly compatible with marriage, in comparison to the numbers of people who married when marrying was simply something you had to do....My preferred vision of marriage involves a culture that approaches it more slowly, more cautiously, and with a greater appreciation of what marriage really entails. A stronger institution of marriage is one that has less frivolous and ill-considered marriages. (For those who are uncomfortable with the notion of less married couples in our society, I can think of many thousands of Americans who are desperate to join the franchise, if given the opportunity. But this is controversial.)"

Freddie deBoer, at Culture11

Humanitarian intervention and wisdom in foreign policy


So I have never been very shy about shifting my political opinions as I evolve intellectually. I have juggled them quite a lot as new evidence or better arguments comes to light. I try to think of things deeply, without the fetters of ideology to too tightly constrain my thoughts(though this is not entirely possible all the time, one can certainly be less ideologically influenced if one tries).

The problem, all too often, is that good ideas are quashed by the ideologues. Yes, at times one needs to stick to ones principles. At other times, though, one needs to reevaluate them.

For instance, I once identified as a neo-con. Perhaps I jumped into those shoes too quickly. I was upset with the Left's willingness to abandon the Iraqi people, and supported finishing what we started, even though I was vehemently opposed to the invasion in the first place. I also supported military action for humanitarian purposes. Somehow, I guess, this made me think I was a neocnservative.

I'm frustrated to no end by the Iraq War, however. We are entangled worse than ever before in the quagmire of mid-east politics. We have emboldened and strengthened Iran. We are in a worse position to help Israel. The only bright light is that things are improving, that Saddam Hussein is dead and gone, and that we might be out of there soon, and while I don't consider it a victory, at least we won't have left Iraq in the throes of all-out civil war and genocide.

One unintended consequence of the war has been the way it has hamstrung any efforts the US may have made to intervene in crises of humanitarian nature that are fast approaching or may already have become genocidal. Like Darfur.

For a glimpse as to my meaning, check out these photographs of the current strife in the Congo. Here is a place that really does need outside help to stabilize. Well, between the disaster of this economy and the Iraq war, the twin failures of nation building and supply side economics, of democracy by force and trickle down economics, we have no ability to effectively intervene. Nor can we even flex the tiniest of muscles when an ally like Georgia is attacked by the Russians.

We have effectively out-sourced our industrial and manufacturing capabilities, and if the auto industry fails then we can kiss this era good-bye. I'm not a fan of bailouts, but come on people! Who will make our tanks? The Chinese? Who will bankroll them? The Chinese? What if we need them to fight the bloody Chinese? I doubt this is in the cards, but who knows?

I think along with the bankrupting of our financial system by greed and foolishness and ego; the off shoring of our manufacturing base; and the massive growth of the Federal government, defense spending, entitlements, etc. we also have seen a shift away from the American Tradition--that being an amalgamation of individualism, hard work, family, community, honest government, fiscal sanity, and moderation. Remember our grandparents? They were frugal--not perfect by any means--but they understand modesty, and simplicity, and hard work. My grandfather was a carpenter, built his own house, and along with my grandmother raised eight children, all of whom have been absurdly successful both in their marriages and in their careers.

What has happened to this generation? Coaxed along by a Government awash in debt, a capitalism of hyper-wealth, of derivatives and subprimes and a class of investment bankers who produce no goods or services, nothing tangible, but only profit endlessly through a series of magic tricks, the best and last being that magical house of cards we see crashing down around us now...

Can we be blamed for our high credit card debt? Our shallowness? Our apathy or materialism? These are the values that have been laid at our feet. Even our most prominent ministers, those heretical televangelists, have given up the old message of simplicity, of casting off our worldly possessions--the whole "first shall be last, and the last shall be first" has become an antiquated notion, I suppose.

And thus we find ourselves, a country wobbling. We are uncertain of our values. Our families have become disjointed, fractured--our divorce rate is higher than ever before--yet we focus on the subject of gay marriage, plucking that tiny speck of dust we see in our neighbors eye out before we see to the log in our own.

So I no longer consider myself a neoconservative. I started this blog because I think in the end, I am an independent--conservative to a point, and liberal to a point, and always searching for more knowledge, more truth, more reason and compassion and grace. There is not a sure answer anywhere. As Freddie said yesterday "I have a deep aversion to those who believe in one truth or one mechanism to advance human kind."

Indeed. And that's a good thing.

Friday, November 21, 2008

Dreher and Jones

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Disgraceful

Sullivan v Dreher

Andrew Sullivan reacts to Rod Dreher. Nobody said this marriage debate would be easy. I guess it goes to the heart of the question of modernity. Dreher sees it intrinsically bound to the failures of our modern culture. Sullivan says Dreher's vision of a return to an older, simpler past is impossible.

I think both are right to some extent. I am very much in line with Dreher's desire to return the culture to a time of heightened spiritual belief, less materialism, and more simplicity. I just disagree that the marriage debate is a fundamental part of the equation. I think other things, like our consumer culture, our media and its glorification of cheap sex, extreme violence, and ridiculous wealth are all far more dangerous to our values than gay marriage.

Sullivan, on the other hand, is wrong to think we can never return to a more teleological society, driven by common purpose, a higher purpose. He's right in that social conservatives need to focus on what is truly important, and denying gays their basic rights is hardly that. With all the ills of this world, social conservatives should be too busy to care about gay marriage.

Essentially I think that the wrong questions are being asked. Modernity is full of moral qualms, but there are good things that have emerged as well. We need to find a way to determine what is truly good, universally good, that has been, perhaps, uncovered only now--like equal rights for women or gays--and what is bad, morally decrepit, or dangerous to a society.

William F Buckley wrote:
Conservatives pride themselves on resisting change, which is as it should be. But intelligent deference to tradition and stability can evolve into intellectual sloth and moral fanaticism, as when conservatives simply decline to look up from dogma because the effort to raise their heads and reconsider is too great.
In other words, it is best to be conservative. Tradition has great value. We should seek the wisdom of the past. But we should not excuse ourselves any creative effort, or any reconsideration of our values simply because everything modern can be written off. Sometimes tradition is wrong.

Thus my constant call for balance. If we do seek to do away with some of the follies of modernity, let us be wise in our choosing. Few would argue that the advancements in science should be rolled back. Some social advances are equally right and just.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Freakonomics Q & A with Ron Paul

Read it here.

Q: It was mentioned you were in favor of getting rid of the Department of Education. Is this true, and if so, how do you feel this would benefit the country?

A: I do believe in eliminating the Department of Education.

First, the Constitution does not authorize the Department of Education, and the founders never envisioned the federal government dictating those education policies.

Second, it is a huge bureaucracy that squanders our money. We send billions of dollars to Washington and get back less than we sent. The money would be much better off left in states and local communities rather than being squandered in Washington.

Finally, I think that the smallest level of government possible best performs education. Teachers, parents, and local community leaders should be making decisions about exactly how our children should be taught, not Washington bureaucrats. The Department of Education has given us No Child Left Behind, massive unfunded mandates, indoctrination, and in come cases, forced medication of our children with psychotropic drugs. We should get rid of all of that and get those choices back in the hands of the people.

Malkin on Paulson "The Naked Emporer"

Malkin has been spot on in her critique of the bailout. I'm as confused as the next person (be they novice or economist, it seems) but one thing I believe: Hank Paulson is not to be trusted, either because he is dishonest and involved in blatant cronyism, or because he is an idiot and has no clue.
Paulson held a bazooka to taxpayers’ heads. He groveled on his knees in front of Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He lured leaders from both political parties into linking arms in a panicked Chicken Little line dance for the beleaguered mortgage industry. Paulson demanded an unprecedented $700 billion troubled assets relief program for the good of the country. For the health of the housing market. For the survival of the economy. No time for deliberation. No time to review the failures of such interventionist approaches around the world. Now, now, now!
Damn skippy.

It's a tough situation, though. Now we also have the auto-makers asking for a bailout, and probably more deserving of one than the idiots on Wall Street. Then again, is either industry really deserving of one? The collapse of the US auto-makers would be disastrous, but isn't it already happening? Hasn't it been a long time coming?

It certainly seems that way to me.

Friday, November 14, 2008

Around the Web on November 14th

Well it's Friday, thank God. I'm at the end of some crazy post-election days of deep introspection. The business surrounding prop 8 has me at odds with fellow conservatives, though I'm heartened by many conservatives and liberals agreeing on universal civil unions and the abolition of state-sanctioned marriage altogether.

I've been thinking about the failures of Bush & co. and re-examining my belief in some basic economic philosophies. I've been blogging lightly and haven't written an article this week at all due to burnout and headaches.

So here are some things I've been reading:

Roland Dodds of "But, I Am a Liberal!" defends Lieberman, and makes a strong case for the Dems keeping him in his chairmanships. I agree, for one because it's just the smart thing to do, but also because Lieberman and the centrist DLC are my favorite part of the Democratic Party, and quite integral to its success in winning over moderates.

Check out Michael Lewis's "The End" which details the excesses and stupidities of the Wall Street industry and culture. Amazing. Just disgraceful. Excellent, excellent article.

For fun, read Rashid Khalidi's "Palestine: Liberation Deferred" While I am not politically in agreement with Mr. Khalidi, I thought the McCain camps attempts to use him as a smear against Obama were downright foolish. Christopher Hitchens agrees.

NormBlog has a moment of better Bushiness.

Bob from Brockley has a thought-provoking piece up: "A Land Without People for a People Without Land" and no, it's not what you're thinking...

The Stark Tenet has some good advice for Mr. Obama. On that note, read Ben Stein's piece at the NYT:
CHAMPION ONLY THE SERIOUS IDEAS Don’t sign on to any economic policy proposals without some statistical or theoretical heft to them.
What a novel idea!

If you haven't already, read the late, great William F. Buckley's treatise on legalizing marijuana. He sailed out into international waters to smoke so as to not break the (bad) law prohibiting its use here. Problem was, he forgot to bring any snacks. Big mistake.

Frontline has a documenatary about Afghanistan out that is a must-see.

And over at Slate there is a conservative forum/debate over the future of the movement.

Unless you're Austin Bramwell, in which case you believe in "The Right to Remain Silent" and stay outside of the movement, where, he believes, the only real accomplishments are made.

Oh, and did you hear? Obama may tap Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State? If he really is building up a Team of Rivals, will he offer McCain a job?

No help for the Congo

Newsweek reports:

While the world wrings its hands over the fate of an estimated quarter million people caught up in the roiling conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo, it seems likely that little will actually be done about the long-running African civil war. The best bet for stopping the violence, the United Nations' 17,000-strong multilateral peacekeeping force, known as MONUC, is spread thin and considered ineffective; it will take months to increase its presence in the country. The European Union is reluctant to deploy a crack force, and southern African leaders have committed only to sending in a "technical team." The world's response, in the words of Henri Boshoff, a military expert for the Institute for Security Studies in Pretoria, is likely to be "too little too late."
And herein lies my frustration with the Iraq war. I won't even begin to describe what I think about the feckless, ineffective, shameless United Nations--but the US should not be tied down either in foolish wars or in the foolish exercise of protecting ungrateful allies from threats they denounce as false...

Malkin defends Kucinich

Michelle Malkin, of all people, gives props to Dennis Kucinich of all people:

Believe it or not, I am going to say something nice about Democrat Rep. Dennis Kucinich. He voted against the bailout every time. In a ready-for-YouTube exchange, he snorted when Kashkari said, (paraphrasing here) “taxpayer money shouldn’t be poured into businesses that are going to fail.” Kucinich retorted that Kashkari would be hearing that line played back to him for the rest of his career.

Damned straight. Snort of the year material. Along with this ignominious line. And this one.

Last time I checked, neither Hell has frozen over, nor has the Earth come to a screaming, screeching halt in its orbit, so I don't know what the heck to think.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Uh...

Shep Smith: Going rogue?



Damn it Shep, keep up the good work!

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

On gay marriage



Also see this thread at Newsvine, on the Conservative case for gay marriage...

Hysterical

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Happy Veterans Day!



I almost joined up but I have a bad back and was disqualified. If I had I would just now be getting discharged from the Marines...if I'd survived of course...

Thanks to all our brave men and women fighting to keep us safe and free!

Monday, November 10, 2008

Roasted

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Blame Game

Klein v Sullivan

Friday, November 7, 2008

Prez # 44

Euro-fascists

From LGF:

Here’s another version of the video showing Vlaams Belang and National Front leaders in Belgium, singing a vile antisemitic song, this time with English subtitles.

If you aren’t aware of the back story, Vlaams Belang is the neo-fascist group with which some so-called “anti-jihad” bloggers insist we need to make alliances. Vlaams Belang has sponsored “anti-Islamization” conferences in Europe, attended by some well-known writers and bloggers—who then turned around and attacked and smeared LGF for refusing to be associated with these Neanderthals.





Yeah. Fuck you too.

Bye bye Kristol?



This raises an obvious question for The New York Times: should Bill Kristol’s contract as an opinion columnist be renewed when it runs up at year’s end? There is no problem with the conservative viewpoint advanced in his pieces—he was after all hired as a replacement for a conservative voice, William Safire. Still, the Times must be concerned about Kristol’s intervention in the campaign he was writing about. Simply put, the pundit meddled in the campaign he was commenting on.
Interesting.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Powell Weeps

See it here.

Shep Smith

Shep Smith is probably the most decent, honest reporter on Fox News. The other day he chastised Joe the Plumber.

This time, Ralph Nader.

Obama's victory speech & McCain's concession speech

Obama Wins!



McCain Concedes (graciously)!

Congratulations Obama!

As of this writing I have seeded, on Newsvine, 270 links, the exact number Obama needed in electoral votes to win this thing. Well, he far surpassed that, and I think this election is as much a referendum on George W Bush and the failed policies of his administration as anything else.

It's also, as many pundits have put it, a transformational election. Nobody, regardless of political affiliation, can deny that. America has just elected the first Black President in its history. For the first time ever we have someone other than an old white guy at the helm--and that, in and of itself, is pretty damn cool.

So while I may not agree with Senator Obama on many things, I'm still filled with pride that America has come as far as it has. I think Obama has a real chance to govern from the center, for all of America, and I hope and challenge him to do so, and to work with his opponents in the coming years to make this country as great as it can be.

Congratulations Obama. You deserve it.

And on a side note, good job McCain, too. You fought hard, and bowed out graciously. You will always be one of the most admirable public servants this country has ever been blessed with.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Election Results