This raises an obvious question for The New York Times: should Bill Kristol’s contract as an opinion columnist be renewed when it runs up at year’s end? There is no problem with the conservative viewpoint advanced in his pieces—he was after all hired as a replacement for a conservative voice, William Safire. Still, the Times must be concerned about Kristol’s intervention in the campaign he was writing about. Simply put, the pundit meddled in the campaign he was commenting on.Interesting.
‘Need to do some norm changing’: Granger’s case spurs renewed debate over
ailing lawmakers
-
Kay Granger’s sudden disappearance in the twilight of her public life is
just the latest example of the lack of transparency on seriously ill and
aging pol...
34 minutes ago
0 comments:
Post a Comment