This raises an obvious question for The New York Times: should Bill Kristol’s contract as an opinion columnist be renewed when it runs up at year’s end? There is no problem with the conservative viewpoint advanced in his pieces—he was after all hired as a replacement for a conservative voice, William Safire. Still, the Times must be concerned about Kristol’s intervention in the campaign he was writing about. Simply put, the pundit meddled in the campaign he was commenting on.Interesting.
"But history shows that economists and researchers have been terrible at
predicting the effects of new technologies on work and workers..."
-
"... so take forecasts like this one seriously but not literally. Even
researchers cranking out studies of AI in workplaces caution that they’re
making use...
37 minutes ago
0 comments:
Post a Comment