This raises an obvious question for The New York Times: should Bill Kristol’s contract as an opinion columnist be renewed when it runs up at year’s end? There is no problem with the conservative viewpoint advanced in his pieces—he was after all hired as a replacement for a conservative voice, William Safire. Still, the Times must be concerned about Kristol’s intervention in the campaign he was writing about. Simply put, the pundit meddled in the campaign he was commenting on.Interesting.
Swapping Bondi for Gaetz eases fears at Justice Department, but only a
little
-
Some career lawyers agree that Pam Bondi is qualified to be attorney
general, even as they worry that she will carry out Donald Trump's desire
for retribut...
27 minutes ago
0 comments:
Post a Comment